waiting to send decision to author npjwaiting to send decision to author npj

7, 10535; 10.1038/ncomms10535 (2016). 110 This checklist is not sent to the Reviewers but must be received by the Editors before the paper can be sent for peer-review. The length of time this stage takes does not affect the decision in any way, it's neither a good nor a bad sign. LJ. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. 2.75, :3.0 | :50.0Manuscript Under Consideration , 2 Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Journals can customize the wording of status terms. Mechanistic Aspect. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of [third party name]. SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, worduse 2007 or later version, mateals letters 3Required Reviews Completed. Cactus Communications. Each complete figure must be supplied as a separate file upload. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. npj Vaccines (npj Vaccines) Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. 156, 35-39 (2002). Although our Editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, the journal is not responsible for the conduct of its referees. If this is the case, your paper will have to wait for its turn to be evaluated by the editor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The Reporting Summary will be published as a Supplementary File alongside all primary research articles in Life Sciences, Health Sciences, Physical Sciences, Applied Sciences, or Society & the environment accepted from January 2019. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. The resubmitted manuscript may be sent back to the original referees or to new referees, at the Editors' discretion. 1, :3.0 | :25.02, 37 When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines . (()--2020-0033) DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. Unnecessary figures should be avoided: data presented in small tables or histograms, for instance, can generally be stated briefly in the text instead. These requirements aim to improve the transparency of reporting and the reproducibility of published results. ICP14018916-1 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 The corresponding author is notified by e-mail when the Editor decides to send a paper for review. The revised version is normally sent back to some or all of the original referees for re-review. Research papers published by the journals represent important advances bringing new insight to a specialized area of research. When electronic structure calculations are reported in the manuscript, the atomic coordinates of the optimised computational models should be provided. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Please consult the appropriate nomenclature databases for correct gene names and symbols. Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. Published papers: The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". Authors may also indicate a limited number of scientists who should not review the paper. ]]> What happens after my manuscript is accepted? Robert Eagling161167100-150Cell PressChem Nature Chemistry Guy15Chem , 1, 4NRTNRTNRT, NRTNHCNRTNHCNRT10000NHCCorrections163ACS National Meeting, ACSGuyGuyNature Chemistry Chem GuyChem GuypptsubmittedacceptedNature Chemistry Guy, 10emailC&EN Stable phosphorus carbene analog debutsRory WatermanPreviewA Bottle-able Phosphinidene, a new chapter in phosphorus chemistry beginsFigure 3, DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. , If the manuscript was peer reviewed the referee comments are also transferrable on request by the author. Cell Biol. Response to Requests for Admission . either in the manuscript text, supplementary information, or the Methods section, as appropriate. The peer review of any submissions for which the Editor has a competing interest is handled by another Editor who has no competing interests, to ensure that the evaluation of these submissions is completely objective. It may be that the journal might be waiting to decide based on the theme of the upcoming issue. The vertical axis of histograms should not be truncated to exaggerate small differences. npj Parkinsons Disease . Meeting abstracts that are not published and papers in preparation should be mentioned in the text with a list of authors (or initials if any of the authors are co-authors of the present contribution). In cases where the work was felt to be of high quality, papers can sometimes be accepted without further review, but if there were serious criticisms, the Editors will consider them in making the decision. Once your articleis accepted for publication, you can track its status with the track your accepted article tool. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. "The male with the appointment at the university? G Protein Coupled . Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. 2.25, :25.040, 40 When acknowledging funding, our recommended best practice is that authors should acknowledge funders and grants on publications when the activities that contributed to that publication are within scope of the acknowledged grant and arise directly from a specific grant. Smith, S.) 180-181 (Macmillan, 2013). | 1.03 g, 0.100 mmol). What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores ( ScholarOne ), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. 0, :1.0 | :25.02021/08/16 Manuscript ReceivedEditor AssignedManuscript Under Consideration2021/08/24 Associate Editor assigned2021/08/27 Manuscript Under Consideration2021/09/01 Waiting to Send Decision to Author2021/09/02 Editorial decision: Reject before peer review, 95 At this size, the optimum font size is 8pt. When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Thank you for visiting nature.com. 3170 USD as publication fees (article processing charges or APCs). The Editors-in-Chief then makes a final decision of accept or reject on any special issue article. The following types of contribution to npj Series journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Brief Communications, Case Report, Comment, Matters Arising, Meeting Report, Perspective, Protocol, Resource, Reviews. The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. More details are available on the manuscript transfer service. Commun. When possible, we prefer to use original digital figures to ensure the highest-quality reproduction in the journal. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Is long period a good or bad sign? figshare) and use their option to provide a private sharing link for the referees to access it. If your manuscript is sent for peer-review, you will also be asked to complete the Nature Portfolio Editorial Policy Checklist. [CDATA[// >